But the Taiwan and Hong Kong regimes later made fatal mistakes. ,

Dramatically increased the sense of threat felt by citizens.” He Mingxiu analyzed it in the book. Based on fieldwork interviews, he re-extracted an analytical framework of "threat, confrontation, and contingency." First of all, the key to the outbreak of the movement is precisely because of the strong sense of threat and the miscalculation of the rulers, making the protesters feel that "if we don't act, it will be too late." The second reading of the Trade in Services Act made the protesters think there was no hope of turning around.

The Umbrella outbreak came after Beijing telemarketing list passed the August 31st Resolution after the year-long " peaceful occupation ", which is equivalent to announcing the demand for true universal suffrage Total failure. In other words, the protesters did not sense favorable winds and actively participated. "What everyone feels is despair, not opportunity." At the same time, the Banfen Loyalty Incident and the Hong Kong police fired 87 tear gas canisters, which aroused strong anger and a sense of crisis among citizens, causing the ruling party to miss out on a good hand. He Mingxiu offered further analysis.

The threat is a comprehensive result, including the tactics of protesters and the missteps of those in power." He called the propulsion strategy of sunflowers and umbrellas "movement brinkmanship". "They insisted on exploring every available avenue, resorting to increasingly violent protest methods, and ultimately impatient and made serious mistakes on the part of those in power." Sunflowers and Umbrellas: Different Developments in a Standoff On March 30, 2014, Lin Feifan gave a speech on Ketagalan Avenue, officially announcing the glorious exit of the occupation.